Best Friends Blog
 

At long last, pet sales on the way out in L.A.

It’s a great day for animals in the city of Los Angeles! On Wednesday of this week, the Los Angeles City Council (by a vote of 12-2) approved an ordinance that bans the retail sale of dogs, cats and rabbits in the city.

With only a formality remaining before the ordinance becomes law, Los Angeles will become the largest community in the United States to enact legislation that puts an end to the flow of animals to pet stores from puppy mills, the large commercial breeding farms that supply pet stores.

For the past two and a half years, Best Friends, under the leadership of our Elizabeth Oreck, has been working closely with the offices of the mayor and city attorney, as well as L.A. City Councilmember Paul Koretz and L.A. Animal Services General Manager Brenda Barnette to craft an ordinance that effectively shuts down the city of Los Angeles for the sale of these animals.

Los Angeles soon will join 27 other cities in North America, including Toronto and 10 other California communities, in putting a major crimp in the pet store trade. The implications are enormous on so many levels, not the least of which is shutting down retail outlets supplied by these still-legal puppy mills. Additionally, more people will be encouraged to adopt from local shelters rather than purchase from a retail outlet or breeder.

This great success initially gained traction when Councilman Koretz expressed interest in an ordinance that would stop the flow of puppy mill animals into the city. From there, the city attorney’s office, with input from the various parties, chose fair, reasonable language to draft the ordinance.

Meanwhile, Elizabeth marshaled support from across the spectrum of Southern California animal welfare. She sent out legislative alerts to Best Friends members and encouraged them to contact city council members for support. Blogs were written, social media posts sent, and support mobilized to attend the various committee and council meetings.

The goal, of course, was to produce an ordinance that would shrink the market for puppy mill animals and reduce motivation to produce and sell animals. There would also be the net effect of reducing chances that breeding animals spend their lives confined in puppy mill misery, forced to have litter after litter.

Other California cities that have adopted “no retail sale of animals” ordinances are Aliso Viejo, Chula Vista, Dana Point, Glendale, Hermosa Beach, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Beach, South Lake Tahoe and West Hollywood. Still more California cities have ordinances that have been drafted, with Burbank posed to join the growing group.

Having so many cities adopt such resolutions is good, but having Los Angeles in the fold is by far the most impactful anti–puppy mill accomplishment to date. If Los Angeles can take this kind of step, then other cities may not be far behind.

Passage of the ordinance should also reverberate across the country, and Elizabeth tells us that she is fielding calls from like-minded civic leaders around the country. Chicago, in particular, appears to be the next big municipality to consider such a progressive ordinance.

So, what started as a true grassroots movement by Best Friends Animal Society continues to pick up steam. More communities are coming to the realization that, with city shelters bulging at the seams with homeless animals, it makes good sense to stop the importation of animals that contribute to their shelters’ overcrowded conditions.

“The potential benefits of ordinances that ban the retail sale of commercially bred pets are significant, and it’s not that difficult to get started,” says Elizabeth. “Even if you don’t have puppy mills in your area, you might consider a proactive ordinance that will restrict the sales of animals by unlicensed breeders. It all helps mitigate the puppy mill problem, or other situations that are the byproducts of irresponsible breeding, such as the online sales of animals shipped around the country that, again, put a strain on local shelters.

The long, arduous fight to halt puppy mills and their effects on animals goes on. In recent years, the work has been difficult — at times trying our patience and testing our will. And though the journey continues, this most recent success in Los Angeles surely gives us cause to celebrate and, at the same time, reaffirms our determination to cut the demand for puppy mill inventory off at its source.

Want to get involved with your own anti–puppy mill ordinance? Best Friends has considerable resources to help concerned citizens approach government leaders about a pet sale ordinance. For more information, contact Elizabeth Oreck at elizabetho@bestfriends.org.

 

Gregory Castle
CEO, Best Friends Animal Society

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    A great day for animals, indeed, but also for all of the amazing, inspiring animal welfare advocates in L.A. and beyond who have been working so tirelessly on behalf of those animals. It really does take a village!

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Please contact the city council to thank them for supporting this. They need to hear from you! http://www.lacity.org/YourGovernment/CityCouncil/index.htm

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Cozzi/100001727817020 John Cozzi

    Congratulations to all of those who made this happen. Now if the rest of the nation can follow suit we will not only see the reduction in puppy mills but a much improved level of understanding what it means to own and care for another living creature. Responsible ownership doesn’t support animal factories.

  • Stella Blue

    Great work!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kelly.m.williams.33 Kelly Marie Williams

    I can only imagine how much work went into this! Thank you for being such a strong voice for the speechless!

  • http://www.facebook.com/dogpack Amy Patterson

    Absolutely fantastic!!!!!!

  • Quetzal Pointers

    Sick. Where do you suppose you will get your loving companion after you put breeders out of buisness, spay and neuter all animals and the current adoption population died out from age?

  • http://www.facebook.com/annie.huff Annie Huff

    If you actually read the article closely, you’ll see that it bans the sale of commercially bred animals and unlicensed breeders.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1372809820 Stephanie Stassi Gans

    I’m so proud of you guys! Congratulations on helping enact such an important ordinance!

  • hayne

    great work! another small step towards animal liberation!

  • dog-lover

    Poorly written article if that is what it is trying to say –

  • Marcella Rosato

    Absolutely terrific! The animals love you

  • Elizabeth Peterson

    Thank God…let’s work on San Diego next.

  • gypsywoman

    Fantastic! Congratulations on such a great accomplishment. I would LOVE to see that happen in South Florida where our stray/abandoned dogs are a huge problem and the shelters are so overwhelmed, there is no need for retail pet outlets! Yeah Best Friends!!

  • Weezi

    Great job, some day we will have No More Puppy Mills, and that’s a very good thing!!

  • Dog Trainer

    Happy to see puppy mills go but hope this doesn’t put too much financial hardship on those hobby (“backyard”) breeders who work hard at maintaining their breeds’ structural soundness and temperament traits. These are, after all, the very people who maintain the ability for us to have little dogs, non-shedding dogs, dogs who have natural bite inhibition, dogs who don’t have to chase every living thing in sight, dogs with long hair, dogs with short hair, and dogs with reduced tendencies to be fearful or aggressive. Their time and money spent proving that their breeding stock has quality, functioning structure and biddable temperaments will never earn them a profit in puppy sales.

  • Claudia

    I sure hope so !!!

  • Claudia

    ….and everywhere else =)

  • Stephanie

    Congratulations on such an incredible accomplishment! As a pet owner & rescue volunteer, I think this is a huge step toward ending the killing of so many innocent shelter dogs. Great job!

  • Quetzal Pointers

    So a licensed mass breeder that churns out hundreds of dogs a year is totally fine but a responsible hobby breeder who has a litter every few years is a villain?
    With the new proposed legislation for me to be a licensed breeder I will have to kick all my dogs outside to a concrete kennel block with cages. Isn’t that the kind of environment you ARA’S are fighting against?

  • Quetzal Pointers

    Still no one wants to answer the question? I have yet to have an ARA answer this question.

  • Quetzal Pointers

    Under the new proposed federal legislation we hobby breeders will be defined as retail outlets unless the buy comes onto our property if they contact us by phone or internet we will fall under this law and will no longer be able to sell our puppies. Please don’t fall for the feel good vibes of this story. All this will do is cut out law abiding citizens and leave you will black market puppy mills.

  • jamz

    This is one huge step. And we all know one step is better than none. Congrats!

  • http://twitter.com/mfbond Marlena

    Thank you!!!

  • roberta Perlis

    YEY Kudos to LA>

  • FourPaws

    When United States animal shelters are empty and out of business, then this question will be answered. Until then, there is no reason for anyone to be breeding dogs and cats when millions, MILLIONS, of healthy, adoptable animals are euthanized every year. End of story.

  • Caitlin

    To even imagine that there would one day be a shortage of companion animals some day in the future is laughable, but also something we can all dream of. For pets to be treated as a privilege, given real value, and be DIFFICULT to acquire would be an incredible accomplishment for our society. Unfortunately, people like you still see them as “products” or commodities that are to be sold for income. Animals are not a BUSINESS, as you suggest.

  • FourPaws

    Exactly! Well said!!

  • http://twitter.com/jbsibley John Sibley

    I think you’ll find that the LA shelters are putting down small dogs with spectacular qualities on a very regular basis.

  • http://twitter.com/jbsibley John Sibley

    Very mixed feelings on this one. No sympathy for puppy millers; they’re scum. But pet shops are out in the open and subject to inspection, regulation, enforcement (even if none of these are, at the moment, priorities in most communities). My fear is that shutting down operations where you can see them will potentially drive buyers to less regulated or unregulated markets: backyard breeders, middlemen/brokers, internet sales. Much of that activity will take place where it is unseen and largely unregulated. Not having read the legislation specifically (though I’d like to, is there a link?), is there a provision to lessen the risk of that?

  • Jan Keefe, Wag ‘N Woof Pets

    Congratulations, this is awesome news! I have been writing a series about puppy mills on my blog, and I am so happy to be able to share this great news with my readers! I love Best Friends, the work you do is incredible.

  • NANCY

    WOW!!! THIS IS GREAT NEWS!!!! I WISH THERE WERE NO PUPPY MILLS AT ALL IN THIS WORLD!!!! THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATION IN GETTING THIS DONE!!!! THANKS FOR YOUR DEDICATION!! MAYBE THIS CAN HAPPEN ALL OVER THE WORLD!!!

  • http://twitter.com/DogMomApril April Johnson

    This is great news! Great work to all!

    ….on another note, I had hoped to share this on Pinterest also, but the photos related to this news are not pinnable. I however will gladly share this terrific news on Twitter!

  • Cindy Miyamoto

    You guys are the best! congrats on such a huge accomplishment

  • sara volk

    Those folks never make money anyway. Most do it for the love of the breed and to improve a specific breed. That is an expensive proposition.

  • http://twitter.com/Dangermouse1973 MouMou

    Take it up with the “hobby” breeders that don’t follow humane protocols. I have a neighbor at the end of my street breeding pointers. He has flown under the radar until one of his poor breeding mamas got loose. My husband found her running on the adjacent busy street with a clothes line trailing from her neck (He keeps these poor dogs tied up in his backyard). We took her to the shelter. They contacted her owner from the tag on her collar and he came (3 days later) to get her. Refused to spay her of course, so, had to pay the breeders license, which he has up to now avoided. He lied to the shelter staff and said he didn’t have any other dogs. Every merchant pays tax, permits and fees. Breeders should be no exception. It took me 3 months to get Animal Reg to finally visit his house and nail him for the other dogs in his yard.

  • Francesca Gillum

    Bravo Best Friends! God Bless You for your love of our sweet animals!

  • Sandy

    Amazing accomplishment… and it’s this kind of success that’s contagious. I can’t wait to see cities across the U.S. and Canada make the same ethical, responsible and KIND decision. Way to go everyone!

  • mrspenguin

    I’m not sure how “hobby breeders” not being able to sell their puppies is a problem at all.

    These aren’t “feel good vibes”, this is a true victory. Congrats to everyone involved!

  • Sorceress

    But what if I want to purchase a pure bred animal? I understand that you want to eliminate puppy mills, but I was a breeder (ocicats) for a time. This was not some sort of “mill”, but was a small home based program. What happens to the licensed breeders? Will this new ordinance be interpreted to include the sale of cats, dogs and rabbits from licensed breeders?

  • Jean Silva

    Thanks for including rabbits! Too often they remain one of the few animals you can find in pet stores after the puppies and kittens have gone.

  • emmelby

    Do you not ordinarily meet the people you sell puppies to?

  • Sarah

    I feel like Best Friends is going to change the entire nation! One movement at a time, one win at a time!

  • Sydney Cicourel

    I am the San Diego Campaign Coordinator for the Companion Animal Protection Society. For the last two plus years, I have been by the side of Carole Raphaelle Davis, West Coast Director for our organization and saw her remarkable introduction to the City Council of LA for the ban on the retail sale of pets in their city. She presented to them, two years of LA pet store investigations, and investigations of the puppy mills that supplied the LA stores. She also provided the sample ordinance language to City Attorney Dov Lesel by way of the other two ordinances she introduced and saw pass in West Hollywood and Glendale.

    Cumulatively, her ordinance package presented to the City of LA involved eight years of information by Davis and “CAPS.” Information she provided also came from protests of LA city pet stores, including one of the largest puppy dealer chains in the US, Barkworks. The protest of Barkworks in the Westside Pavillion marked the first protest of it’s kind in a major mall setting where over one hundred protestors showed including kids from a local inner city school. The store will now have to go “humane” or close because of Davis’ seminal contribution.

    My interest in posting this message is that many organizations, unfortunately, “rush in” when success for animals has been achieved to take credit. I believe credit needs to be given where it is due. Ms. Davis worked tirelessly for CAPS and for breeder dogs in puppy mills and MUST receive the credit she is due!

    Thank you, Carole. Because of your amazing contribution, animal lovers everywhere can rejoice. To the innocent animals suffering in puppy mills, we won one for you!

  • Dani Duran

    Thank God and Thank you Best Friends for coming to Calif. and making a difference!

  • frankie1964

    Yeah, that’ll happen…

  • frankie1964

    Apparently not. Boo hiss.

  • Anne

    Puppy mill owners don’t do it for the love of the breed, they do it for the love of money. These are the people who must stop producing animals that wind up in shelters by the thousands.

  • Anne

    Pet shops get their “product” from puppy millers. Just because the pet shop puppies are out in the open doesn’t mean a thing. The problem isn’t the pet store, it’s where the puppies come from. In other words, you can’t see a thing from a regulated pet store. All you see are adorable little puppies.

    Driving buyers to another market is a good thing. How about an animal shelter? A rescue group? Even a back yard breeder is better than a puppy miller because the buyer can see where the puppies came from and how they are treated/how they live.

    The point is to dry up the need for a constant supply of cute puppies. If they pet stores can’t sell them – no one needs a bunch of puppies in the window.

  • Michael

    We put **thousands** upon **thousands** of dogs to death each year because nobody wants them. There will be no shortage of loving companion animals just because we cut back on the breeding/your profits.

  • Michael

    You’re confusing your legislation. This legislation bans retail sales of puppies. There is no longer a need for you to mass produce puppies for retail sale. There is no mention of breeder definitions or concrete blocks. That is another piece of legislation. Go fight that one.

  • michael

    No. This ordinance prohibits retail sale of dogs, cats and rabbits. You can still buy animals from breeders directly (where you can see what’s going on) and you can **always** find pure bred animals at the pound (they are a dime a dozen) and at animal rescues groups. This legislation is a good thing. There will be less false demand (people who think the pet store is the only place to buy an animal) and therefore less mass production of puppies, kittens and rabbits who will wind up in animal shelters after the honeymoon phase of pet ownership is over.

  • Michael

    And really, Quetzal Pointers, if you don’t consider yourself an ARA why are you in the business of breeding animals? Don’t ALL your Pointer puppies deserve to have a good life?

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    So sad and shortsighted. Well intended, sure, but futile. I am a true animal activist who finds this ban a waste of resources. In Kansas we go straight to the source and close the puppy mills. Problem solved. What a long way around the issue, California, just to treat the symptom. Maybe other places could learn something from Kansas Animal Heath officials. Has L.A. not heard of prohibition? It didn’t work.

    You must get to the source. The answer lies in education and the elimination of puppy mills. Banning retail sales accomplishes nothing. Most Kansas pet stores voluntarily stopped selling puppies and kittens many years ago but that didn’t stop puppy mills from breeding and consumers from buying. Supply and demand. If someone wants to buy a pure bred dog, they’ll buy a pure bred dog, pet store or no pet store. Plain and simple.

    Banning dog and cat retail sales will not affect consumer demand nor will it increase adoption of unwanted dogs. Educated consumers stopped buying dogs from pet stores a long time ago. They buy directly from breeders and have for many years. People who don’t want a shelter dog are not going to adopt one simply because their local pet store has no dogs for sale. They’ll just buy from a breeder. Our local shelters recognize this and work with the pet stores to promote responsible ownership. In my town, because of education, the slippery slope of a ban is unnecessary.

    In Lawrence, Kansas, pet stores voluntarily stopped selling dogs and cats over ten years ago and yet the number of unwanted dogs and cats increased. The state of Kansas has fewer retail dog and cat sales than at any point in history yet the shelters continue to fill. Do the math. The issue was not and is not the retailers.

    As nice as it seems, merely banning the retail sale of pets will not reduce demand nor increase adoption. We know. We’ve tried it. Our pet store sold a few, mixed breed “oops” puppies for people a few times a year up until the early nineties while promoting adoption since day one, in 1988. We worried, though, that having dogs and cats available in our store might detract from the adoptions we were promoting, so we chose to stop selling them. Then we led the charge, 15 years ago, for all pet stores to voluntarily reduce sales or completely stop retailing dogs and cats, hoping to reduce overpopulation.

    We willingly promoted adoption in our store weekend after weekend long before it was politically correct. Many Kansas stores followed suit, including PetCo and PetSmart. But nothing changed. The unwanted population continued to rise — proving that pet stores are not the problem. Irresponsible breeding is the problem. Shut down the mills and only responsible breeders remain. The price will go up but educated, responsible consumers won’t mind because they’ll understand why.

    It’s sad to see what a nation full of band-aids we are becoming. For all this effort, this ban will accomplish nothing except to jeopardize pet stores which are the most prevalent, direct link consumers have to pets and the best possible source of education for pet owners. Let’s think this through. Other than a brief, emotional pacifier for us animal activists, this ban does no good. A retail ban will not stop people from buying pets any more than prohibition stopped people from drinking alcohol. Direct intervention with puppy mills and education regarding responsible pet ownership is the only solution. I’m just grateful I live in a forward thinking community who recognizes the value of responsibly fostering the human-animal bond so bans that only treat the symptom are not needed.

  • http://twitter.com/jbsibley John Sibley

    So an internet seller is better than a pet store? Sorry, no. You see even less than a pet store. Same with a broker, or a well-planned backyard breeder. Driving buyers to a less regulated, less transparent source is not necessarily a good thing.

  • http://twitter.com/jbsibley John Sibley

    Not sorry for you at all. You’ve not self-regulated. “Hobby breeders” can be every bit as abusive as the mills.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Barking up the wrong tree! Retail pet sales are a tiny fraction of all dog sales. Usually I respect this organization’s efforts but this was a waste of effort and resources. What’s next? When shelters get too popular will you ban the adoption of dogs? This is way off base and solved nothing.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Which is why this effort should be focused on puppy mills, not pet stores. Get to the source.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Not true. Very, very few pet shops get puppies from puppy mills and haven’t for over a decade. Many only sell from specific breeders who are basically hobbyists, only producing one litter or less per year. How can an entire city miss the mark on something like this? Your ban accomplished nothing good as you will see.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    You won nothing for those animals. Shut down all puppy mills. Then rejoice. This ban accomplished nothing. Check the stats a year from now. You’ll see this ban won’t make a dent in the real issue – puppy mills. What a waste of effort treating a tiny symptom instead of getting to the source of the problem.

  • Michele

    Fantastic! I hope New York City and New Jersey are next. I’d be happy to help with that effort

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1126253215 Joan Brown

    Thank you Best Friends for your devotion to animal welfare. You are the best!

  • Linda Wilson

    This is so wonderful! I wish this would spread like wildfire across the country. It would be my dream come true to end puppy mills and background breeders.

  • Linda Wilson

    Whoops — I meant backyard breeders. Not use to using an IPad.

  • http://twitter.com/Julia_Busch Julia Busch

    This is the only post on this page that makes sense.

  • Pam Stack

    I live in Pittsburgh and would LOVE to see this happen in Pennsylvania……because as we all know, PA has a large puppy mill problem!

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Thank you, Julia. I’m not trying to rant at all. Just hoping to shed some painfully accurate light on how this ban, like others before it, makes us feel good temporarily but ultimately accomplishes no good. The effort would be better spent focusing on closing puppy mills and educating consumers. I hope we activists can now refocus on the real task at hand.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=571131868 Breanne McMullen Boyle

    Not true to you. Many pet stores are definitely still getting puppies from internet/puppy mill locations. Know your facts.

  • Rhea

    Proud to be an Angeleno today!

  • Kaylee

    Sherry, you had a great post. But I’m curious; did Kansas run into problems getting a law banning puppy mills or was it really just a matter of getting people to commit to the concept?

  • Kaylee

    Is Best Friends also going to work with states and cities on legislation that will ban puppy mills? It seems that going for the source would be a very effective way to stop this problem.

  • Guest

    What does this mean for resposible and ethical breeders????

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.hartman3 Jennifer Vaughn Hartman

    What does this mean for responsible and ethical breeders?????

  • http://twitter.com/jbsibley John Sibley

    Sherry, that’s an outright lie.

  • http://twitter.com/jbsibley John Sibley

    Since it’s hard to get a simple answer here, here’s a copy of the ordinance that should answer some questions:

    http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2011/11-0754_rpt_atty_9-20-12.pdf

    Note that this is a TEMPORARY ban – 3 years. I think that’s a good thing, as they’ll be able to evaluate if it’s working and if it should be kept.

    My reading says that it would not affect small (hobby) breeders.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    How so? Based on what information? You clearly are misinformed. Even in the heart of the 90s KS/MO puppy mill scandals only 3 stores in KS were actually associated with puppy mills. The myth that all pet stores get puppies from puppy mills is antiquated. Most don’t even carry puppies and haven’t in years. Do your research. Current research.

    Most pet shop puppies come directly from breeders these days. After the puppy mill scandals, stores that sold dogs had to clean up their acts or close. It was the best thing that could have happened to our industry. Forced out the substandard pet shops – without legislation. This change was industry wide. Even the few bad shops who remain and choose to still buy from mills in your state make up only a tiny fraction of retail dog sales. You give your consumers no credit at all.

    10 years ago this legislation may have made a difference. In 2012 it is effort that would have been better spent eliminating the remaining puppy mills directly. I hate to rain on your parade but facts are facts. I’ve done this for 25 years. My store sets the standard for our state and serves as the training site for new inspectors. I work with the state health board and shelters directly. They have done an outstanding job shutting down puppy mills and didn’t need legislation to do it. Our pet stores champion their efforts and support the cause by choice, not force.

    Most responsible pet stores stopped selling dogs a long time ago anyway so we aren’t even affected by these bans. It’s just sad that BFAS didn’t focus this effort somewhere more meaningful. If you don’t want pet stores selling puppy mill dogs then target the few who still do and focus the rest of your limited resources directly on the mills. Don’t punish thousands of responsible breeders and shops for the sins of a few.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Our animal health officials went after the mills before we even passed any laws. There are only a few state inspectors but with voluntary help from pet stores and a lot of hard work they’ve been able to really put a halt on puppy mills. of course new ones will always surface now that they can hide behind a web site. But our inspectors stay on top of them.

    With the franchise pet stores reducing overall puppy purchases and willingly ceasing purchases from puppy mills and most of the independent stores enacting a self imposed ban, we thought – like California – the problem would take care of itself. It didn’t. Dog supply sales and unwanted dogs increased. Consumers kept buying dogs. The state had to go after the mills directly to make a difference.

    It’s a more difficult approach but far more effective and a better use of limited resources. Pet store owners are a tight group. We all know each other. If a few of the top stores set a precedent, most of the others will follow suit — for better business if nothing else.

  • Gracie

    Get a grip! Where do you think those cute pet store puppies come from? Reputable breeders want to meet the people who buy their pups, they don’t sell them in pet stores. Also kudos to those pet stores that host adoption clinics instead of selling puppies.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    I live my life according to facts and am passionately opposed to puppy mills. To accomplish what you need to do requires more than just random commentary on the web. This ban is fine but it really wasted a lot of effort. The percentage of retail dog sales that originate from puppy mills is lower than you think. This same effort put toward those remaining pet stores and the puppy mills themselves would have been much better use of limited resources and could have accomplished what still needs to be addressed. Punishing all for the sins of a few just because it’s easier than handling the problem directly is really not something to celebrate. I’m merely trying to redirect this effort to addressing the real issue instead of dancing around it.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Even years back when many pet stores were selling puppies most of us knew the breeders personally because they weren’t even breeders, per se. 100% of the puppies we had in the 80s and early 90s were either left in a box on our doorstep or from local residents who had one litter on occasion. I bought the whole litter at once in order to keep them together longer. Since you are not a pet store owner you truly are not in a position to make assumptions sound like statements. Relatively speaking there are a small percentage of pet stores still selling puppies from mills. Those are the stores you should be going after, along with the puppy mills themselves.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Fantastic! Let me know what we can do to help. Love to see the groups out there striving to reach the same goals :-)

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Hi John – While it is true that some individuals may turn to the Internet or backyard breeders to purchase puppies, we are hoping that most will instead turn to shelters and rescue groups to find their next pet or, if they prefer to buy, to responsible hobby breeders. Over 70,000 animals are euthanized in Los Angeles city and county shelters every year — at taxpayer expense. To continue importing puppies and kittens from mills in other states while we are killing the surplus that are already filling our shelters simply doesn’t make sense.

    You can read the ordinance here: http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2011/11-0754_rpt_atty_9-20-12.pdf

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Hi Dog Trainer – This will actually drive business to responsible hobby breeders (not to be confused with backyard breeders, who are breeding irresponsibly and without oversight), because the people who choose not to adopt will still have the option to buy from those folks doing it right.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Hi Quetzal Pointers – This ordinance for the city of Los Angeles should not be confused with the USDA’s proposal to bring internet sellers into compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and require the same licensing and inspections as those breeders who sell their animals wholesale. In fact, the USDA has proposed to increase the exemption for hobby breeders from 3 unaltered females to 4, so the USDA proposal shouldn’t impact you at all, unless you have 5 or more unaltered females. The L.A. ordinance refers only to pet stores supplied by commercial breeders, not to responsible hobby breeders, who never sell their animals to pet stores.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Actually, by decreasing the supply of these animals, it will decrease the demand. It is simple economics. As long as puppy mills are legal, we can’t just shut them down, which is why we address the problem through legislation, education and adoption programs. Puppy mills are in business to supply the retail pet trade, and as long as pet stores continue to import those products into their stores, people will continue to purchase them, keeping the industry alive and thriving. We understand that there are differing opinions on this strategy, but since 27 cities have taken this step, it seems there is general consensus that this is a reasonable and effective step toward mitigating the puppy mill problem throughout the U.S.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Unfortunately, Kaylee, puppy mills are legal and therefore can’t be banned. But we have been working with state and local governments for several years to enact legislation to improve breeding regulations, provide pet store disclosure, ban the sale of animals at swap meets, etc., and restrict the sale of milled animals in pet stores.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Thanks, Jean. We focused specifically on the animals that are dying in the highest numbers in our shelters.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    It means those breeders should see an increase in business from folks who choose to buy rather than adopt. The ordinance does not apply to responsible hobby breeders, only to commercially bred pets in pet stores.

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    Thank you, Sydney. There are many individuals and groups who have contributed to the fight against puppy mills. We are particularly proud of the Best Friends volunteers, who have been peacefully demonstrating at nearly every location of Barkworks, including the Westside Pavilion store, every single weekend for 3 and 1/2 years, and supplied the evidence for the current legal action against the Barkworks corporation. The animal welfare movement can only be stronger and more effective when we all work together and don’t get bogged down in competitiveness or concern about “credit”, so we appreciate that there are so many folks who are putting their self interests aside and focusing their energy on fighting the good fight for the animals. I’m sure the CAPS folks, with all their excellent commitment to the protection of animals, would agree. Keep up the good work!

  • Elizabeth Oreck

    As I mentioned in another comment, Sherry, puppy mills are in business to supply the retail pet trade, and they produce 2-4 million puppies every year (the range is due to the high number of unlicensed commercial breeding facilities). We consider that number significant, especially when one considers that about that same number of adoptable dogs and cats are being killed in U.S. shelters every year. It begs the question, why do we continue to manufacture so many animals when we already have so many that we’re having to kill the surplus?

  • Susan

    Congratulations Best Friends, LA, and all involved! This is a great message and I hope that more places (like Austin) catch on quickly–you have my vote!

  • Susan

    Congratulations Best Friends, LA, and all involved! This is a great message and I hope that more places (like Austin) catch on quickly–you have my vote!

  • Adpjulie

    Hi John,

    During the Best Friends Conference there was a speaker by the name of Rene, he was previously a pet store owner, and he admittedly bought from puppy mills (at the time he did not know this…but once he researched the point past the broker…he understood and made a change)

    His store happened to be visited by a Best Friends volunteer and he was asked” Where do your puppies come from?” He proudly said from different states, etc. She then informed him he was supporting a cruel industry called “milling” he thought this couldn’t be! He researched found out that the Hunte Corporation (broker) was indeed selling him puppy mill puppies.

    He went back to the volunteer weeks later and said I want to make a change, help me. So…thus began his new “store front” which is only rescue adoptions, grooming services, product sales, and doggy daycare. He went from a $100,000.00 annual income selling puppy mill dogs to…..a $300,000.00 annual income working with rescue!! This is because his clients love what he is doing, they respect his work and continually come back for the other services that he now offers to new adopters! Sooo…story told it is better to help rescue than to support puppy mills. Puppy mills, are not regulated to the satisfaction of responsible pet owners. The AWA places very minimal standards on the welfare of these dogs and their puppies, no exercise required, no socialization required, and mesh flooring so most puppies cannot learn to walk properly, but this is acceptable per AWA standards.

    Convince YOUR local pet store operators that there is an alternative, end the cruelty.

  • http://www.facebook.com/crystal.blackdeer Crystal Swann Blackdeer

    As a licensee who attended the Governor’s Pet Animal Advisory Board meeting Oct 31st in Salina, I applaud the efforts of the KS Animal Facility Inspection Program, but I don’t think any of the inspectors would say that mills are a non-problem in KS.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Puppy mills, illegal or not, will never be a non-problem in any state. Close one down, another opens. That will probably never change. That is why our efforts need to be spent addressing the issue directly. Find the original source of retail puppies and if it is a mill, shut it down. Then fine or shut down the pet store for violating the rules and not knowing the origin of their puppies. A blanket ban merely takes the pet store out of the equation and makes it easier for mills to go unnoticed. Adding strict requirements to pet store licensing (with regard to animal origin) could have accomplished the same thing as this ban without enabling puppy mills even further.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Thank you for your comment. I agreed with that concept at first but what happened in Kansas proved that decreasing puppy supply did not decrease demand. Much like prohibition. It only forced more of the supply to go off the radar. It should work – in theory it does work – but with something people really want, it doesn’t. Example: We’ve been trying to reduce the supply of marijuana for decades by keeping it illegal yet it is still available everywhere and, in fact, the quality has gotten worse and even become increasingly dangerous with no regulation.

    With something that is not in such demand, or that has a simple, better alternative, reducing supply might work. With the number one pet in the country, though, we need a more direct approach.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    This is the kind of effort that is worth the resources. Not just treating the symptom, but addressing the root of the problem. Kudos!

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    Correction: this ordinance bans the retail sale of ALL dogs, cats, and rabbits in pet stores, regardless of origin. This includes puppy mill dogs and dogs from responsible breeders and individuals who just bred one litter in their home. This includes indiscriminate backyard rabbit breeders as well as one litter of rabbits bred as a 4H project. This is a blanket ban against all retail sales of these animals with no regard to origin – just to be clear.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    This is where we need to get up to speed on supply and demand. Puppy mills were originally in business to supply the retail pet trade. True. But with the retail pet trade of dogs at an all time industry low, and puppy mills in many states at an all time high, anyone can see that the end consumer is still buying from the mills, pet store or no pet store. So while I wholeheartedly agree that pet stores should refrain from selling puppy mill puppies, or perhaps any puppies for that matter, the fact remains that consumer demand is what drives supply.

    Retailers stock what sells and discontinue what doesn’t. Otherwise they go bankrupt. If consumers stopped buying puppies from pet stores, pet stores would stop selling them anyway. They’d have no choice. The simple truth is that consumers want pure bred dogs and they will get them one way or another, with or without a pet store. There will always be demand. The only real hope is to impose strict regulation on all breeders (which will make it easier to shut down mills) and to educate consumers to always buy responsibly. Pet stores are the biggest, most direct link to consumers and the best possible source to educate misinformed consumers.

    Activists need to learn to join forces with good pet stores and use their resources. The consumers we need to reach are the uneducated consumers who don’t realize the importance of responsible pet ownership. They are the ones still shopping for dogs in pet stores. If we team with responsible pet stores to educate these consumers, these pet stores can be our best resource and our direct access to help further our cause.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    This is where we need to get up to speed on supply and demand. Puppy mills were originally in business to supply the retail pet trade. True. But with the retail pet trade of dogs at an all time industry low, and puppy mills in many states at an all time high, anyone can see that the end consumer is still buying from the mills, pet store or no pet store. So while I wholeheartedly agree that pet stores should refrain from selling puppy mill puppies, or perhaps any puppies for that matter, the fact remains that consumer demand is what drives supply.

    Retailers stock what sells and discontinue what doesn’t. Otherwise they go bankrupt. If consumers stopped buying puppies from pet stores, pet stores would stop selling them anyway. They’d have no choice. The simple truth is that consumers want pure bred dogs and they will get them one way or another, with or without a pet store. There will always be demand. The only real hope is to impose strict regulation on all breeders (which will make it easier to shut down mills) and to educate consumers to always buy responsibly. Pet stores are the biggest, most direct link to consumers and the best possible source to educate misinformed consumers.

    Activists need to learn to join forces with good pet stores and use their resources. The consumers we need to reach are the uneducated consumers who don’t realize the importance of responsible pet ownership. They are the ones still shopping for dogs in pet stores. If we team with responsible pet stores to educate these consumers, these pet stores can be our best resource and our direct access to help further our cause.

  • http://twitter.com/SherryEmersonPW Sherry Emerson

    THIS is EXACTLY the best approach! Educate, educate, educate. Then let the pet store be your voice! Most pet store owners are passionate about animals and are already taking this approach. My store has been doing this since 1988. Those stores who remain behind the times will understand this approach if someone will take the time to actually talk to them. Yes, as pet store owners, they should already know better. Agreed. But if they don’t, instead of alienating them and pitting activists against each other, think more globally and realize we are all on the same side.